Hayley Williams, pictured at left, lead singer of Paramore, found herself not safe for work after a topless photo was leaked onto her Twitter account late Thursday night.

The photo, which looks as though it was shot by Williams herself, was quickly removed from her page, for all the good that actually does.

While the rest of the Internets tear themselves apart with self-righteous "leave her alone" posts and the like, I'll just say sit back and enjoy it. There is nothing Hall of Fame-caliber about this pic, but at least Williams is hotter than the usual band of skanks who seem to wind up in this predicament.

Here is a few more funny pictures for you to enjoy.

The only title that I'm not surprised John Cena hasn't won....yet and yes, Jesus loves you.

These two are super funny but you gotta click them to see. I'm not going to ruin the joke for you by telling you.

Wal-Mart and Skittles. Go on, you know you want to click that last one.

See you next week.

Click on the picture for a larger look.

Tila Tequila finally finds a man and Top Notch security fence.

The 5-0 doing a great job protecting our streets and PROOF!

Call of Duty: Woman's Edition and a Diet Pepsi please. See you next week.

by Thomas Keister

With the political circus in full swing over President Obama's nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, I found it much easier to simply avoid the punditry on cable than hear a hundred talking heads split right down the middle using the same three or four talking points. Wise move on my part. So far, it's boiled down to experience, opposition to military recruiters on Harvard's campus, and some kind of nonsense about lesbianism somehow being tied to softball. Here I was, thinking the height of foolishness had been the pubic hair on the can of Coke.

Thankfully, whenever there seems to be a lack of foolishness, Pat Buchanan is right there, yelling for it to get back on his lawn, right next to the lawn jockey.

I have, for years, unsuccessfully tried to figure out why MSNBC continues to give America's racist grandpa airtime to do anything other than dramatically clutch his chest and topple from his chair. Even Rachel Maddow seems to be powerless to act any way other than happy when "Uncle Pat" is in the same frame. For a woman with a Ph.D., that is just a bit disappointing.

In Buchanan's latest show of proof he either needs stronger pills, or a tripling of the current dosage, in his syndicated column for World Net Daily last Thursday he bemoans the idea that, should Kagan be confirmed, there will be three Jews on the Supreme Court. Buchanan panics that "If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than two percent of the U.S. population, will have thirty-three percent of the Supreme Court seats. Is this the Democrats' idea of diversity?"

Pat Buchanan talking about diversity is like Tiger Woods talking about preserving fidelity in one's marriage. Both men are big on their particular concepts now, yet both secretly yearn for simpler days, when the situations were more to their liking. Granted, I doubt Tiger wishes it was 1955 like Pat does, but the logic is still sound.

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, Pat Buchanan's scared of a world in which the white Protestants and Catholics are victimized by liberal bias, a world in which, gasp, Catholics only hold six of the nine seats on the Supreme Court. The horror. "Not in living memory," Buchanan swoons, "has a Democratic president nominated an Irish, Italian, or Polish Catholic." And yet, through it all, the Catholics find themselves with six justices. It would be nothing short of inspirational that the Catholics have risen above such obstacles, except for the plain fact that Pat Buchanan does not have a clue what the hell he is talking about. This guy probably still expects Clarence Thomas to park his car for him when he visits the high court.

Debating experience? I always like to say if it were for experience, man would never have walked on the moon. When it comes down to experience for a Supreme Court justice, I would rather take the candidate who's never been a judge, but can at least tell the difference between receiving an email and receiving a page. Who the blue hell even uses a pager anymore?

Debating the presence of military recruiters on Ivy League campuses? I'm not arguing against serving one's country, or recruiting others to do the same, but I do have a problem with those same recruiters trying to convince someone gaining that level of education to go take a chance on getting blown up for $14k a year while propping up the Afghan opium industry. Come to think of it, I have a problem with recruiting for that mission on any campus, college or otherwise.

Debating lesbianism and softball? Not sure where to tell you to go for that. The RNC may have some ideas, but I couldn't even begin to tell you how much a softball game in S&M gear would run your checkbook.

Debating diversity? That's all well and good, unless you are debating with a fine print kind of guy like Pat Buchanan, whose ideal Supreme Court would have a sign on the front reading "Jews need not apply."

Now, if someone could just figure out how to get Pat to retire to Boca...

by Thomas Keister

Don't get me wrong. I have been a fan of the Law & Order franchise since the first season, way back in my freshman year of high school in 1990. I've been
through it all, whether it was Ben Stone's exit, Mike Logan blasting a city councilman in the mouth, Serena Southerlyn's out-of-left-field lesbian admission, or whatever in the hell Trial by Jury was supposed to be. I will never be optimistic enough to assume anything will last forever, but NBC's recent annoucement that they were cancelling the original Law & Order series at the end of its twentieth season left me questioning the network's sanity, the tiny, walnut-sized scrap that remains.

To simply cast off as show as durable as Law & Order, with nary a farewell episode in sight, speaks volumes to either the arrogance or the desperation of
NBC, a network that seems to have found a comfortable place with their own mediocrity. I have fallen into the mindset of other fans, who wonder why the
network doesn't simply bring the show back for a twenty-first season, at thirteen episodes, in order to script up a fitting series finale. In other words,
nothing near the drama I can imagine NBC milking out of Minute To Win It, or God forbid, The Marriage Ref.

Law & Order was hardly a dead horse trying valiantly to make it one more lap around the track, or a show dealing with a complete cast overhaul, such as the revamped Law & Order: Criminal Intent, so the logic of retiring it before a historical mark is reached, especially in favor of a new spinoff set in Los
Angeles, is that of a man in midlife crisis marrying a 23-year-old Hooters waitress. Sure, he's digging it now, but in a couple of years, he'll be holding
his head and pining for better days. While I imagine one could make the point from a production cost standpoint, there is also a safety in sticking with a
show that had earned eleven consecutive Emmy nods for Best Dramatic Series (1992-2002, with a win in 1997) among its 52 total nominations.

Maybe I am being a bit premature. Some reports have talks still underway to being the show back, but with NBC's recent track record on handling shows, I
wouldn't be putting off reading new scripts if I were a L&O cast member.

by Thomas Keister

Ran across this on BoingBoing earlier today, and couldn't resist.

The reason Third World countries suck? They have unnecessarily complicated drug paraphernalia.

Just buy a pack of Zig Zags, already.

Tonight only, Free Rein Media presents both Probably Uncalled For and Inside the Squared Circle on a special Super Show Wednesday. The action all starts at 11pm Eastern with an all new Probably Uncalled For and then slaps you a double dose at midnight with an all new Inside the Squared Circle.

Entertainment so big, your guaranteed to choke on it!

The action all starts tonight and only on Blog Talk Radio.com

Come join Dr. Thomas Keister and "The Internet Legend" ppdingles this week for an all-new episode of the smartest damn award-nominated world-wide talk radio monster - Probably Uncalled For! It's why talk radio was invented! Topics to include a slight nod to 4/20, the new all-time British Drinking Champion, the continued flogging of the dead horse known as political correctness, and other notable brilliant observations to be determined. Live call-in lines 646-478-5145 and chat room open the duration of the broadcast. Rated Mature for adult language and content: discretion is advised. Find out what the world is listening to, LIVE as always on Blog Talk Radio!

Tonight 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific
BlogTalkRadio.com/ProbablyUncalledFor

Probably Uncalled For also Available on iTunes!

Don't Forget to Vote for Us for Best Podcast of 2010 @ BloggersChoiceAwards.com!

by Darrell Mays

"The Grandaddy of Them All", "The Grandest Stage of Them All" and "The Showcase of the Immortals." WrestleMania goes by many names but has it obtained a new name. Just another Pay Per View?

Every year the WWE builds all their storylines up to climax at WrestleMania. It is the higest priced event of the year. But is it worth it anymore?

For the last six years, the main event has had the same guys in it. Batista, HHH, John Cena, HBK, Edge, Undertaker and Randy Orton. There have been a few exceptions like Rey Mysterio, Big Show and Kurt Angle. But mainly the same guys just get rotated every year for the big matches at Mania. Not to mention we have seen them all fight on countless Raw's, Smackdown's and other pay per views throughout the year. Seeing them at Mania isn't really that special no matter what stipulation they add.

WrestleMania should feature first time match-ups. Not feuds we have seen before. On occasion it works but almost every match is one we have seen and that takes away from the appeal that it is special because it is at WrestleMania.

WrestleMania 20 in 2004 was the last time the WWE put together an original card for Mania. Ever since then they have presented a copy of the previous years show with the top guys moved around the main events. Think about it. When was the last time you saw a new face in a main event match?

Plus the undercard is no different. Although I love the Money in the Bank match, every year it seems the same guys are in it. Shelton Benjamin has been in 5 out of 6 MITB matches. Matt Hardy, Kane, MVP and Christian have all been in 3 and none of these guys has ever won it.

The Divas are always a last minute time filler on the Mania card. The WWE will shove them down our throats all year and then at Mania time, Creative really doesn't do crap with them. We always get some kind of battle royal or lumber jack match.

WrestleMania used to be magic. Even when Hulk Hogan was always in the main event, he always had a new and fresh opponent each year. The booking seems lazy and it feels they hang all their hopes on one or two matches to carry the card. Sure HBK vs Taker at WM 25 was awesome. But their rematch did not live up to the hype.

This pay per view needs new faces in the main event matches. If the WWE is to justify charging $55 then they need to give us what we pay for and that is WrestleMania delivering the best and biggest in pro wrestling. You can only reheat leftovers so many times before the entire meal is ruined.